![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
http://www.examiner.com/x-17319-Chicago-Music-Industry-Examiner~y2010m4d12-The-Young-Veins-Interview
I stumbled upon it through this twitter by this chick calling Brendon and Spencer liars and thieves and other such nonsense, and I am confused as all hell.
I'm trying to figure out how Ryan could have seen things differently. The very first post, written by him and Jon and put up on the official website on July 6th said VERY CLEARLY that Spencer and Brendon were remaining as Panic at the Disco and that all tour dates would go on as planned. In several of the MTV articles with Ryan throughout July of 2009, Brendon and Spencer are referred to, by the interviewer and Ryan as "New Panic!" Just one of the mentions: "He said that while he hasn't heard any of the new Panic! stuff, he wishes Urie and Smith well"
Supposing that Ryan hadn't known, and considering the antagonistic and less than friendly vibe of those interviews, why wouldn't he have brought it up then? I am really uncomfortably with the fact that he's bringing it up *now*. Because even if it is true, it comes off and petty and dishonest and I don't know how to deal with that.
I've been reminded, too, of how immature Ryan was about the whole thing, re-reading these articles. How he said he was avoiding talking to anyone at Decaydance and not answering Wentz's calls. It makes me think if he honestly didn't know bout Brendon and Spencer taking the name it WAS HIS OWN FAULT. There are a lot of questions about this sort of thing when a band splits, and if Ryan wasn't *talking* to people from the label, how could he expect to know about the decisions that were being made.
It's weird, because for the first time in a long time, I'm not angry toward Ryan. I guess I can believe that there was some miscommunication (in that he refused to communicate with Decaydance and Pete), but I feel that it is really inappropriate and immature for him to say this now.
I stumbled upon it through this twitter by this chick calling Brendon and Spencer liars and thieves and other such nonsense, and I am confused as all hell.
I'm trying to figure out how Ryan could have seen things differently. The very first post, written by him and Jon and put up on the official website on July 6th said VERY CLEARLY that Spencer and Brendon were remaining as Panic at the Disco and that all tour dates would go on as planned. In several of the MTV articles with Ryan throughout July of 2009, Brendon and Spencer are referred to, by the interviewer and Ryan as "New Panic!" Just one of the mentions: "He said that while he hasn't heard any of the new Panic! stuff, he wishes Urie and Smith well"
Supposing that Ryan hadn't known, and considering the antagonistic and less than friendly vibe of those interviews, why wouldn't he have brought it up then? I am really uncomfortably with the fact that he's bringing it up *now*. Because even if it is true, it comes off and petty and dishonest and I don't know how to deal with that.
I've been reminded, too, of how immature Ryan was about the whole thing, re-reading these articles. How he said he was avoiding talking to anyone at Decaydance and not answering Wentz's calls. It makes me think if he honestly didn't know bout Brendon and Spencer taking the name it WAS HIS OWN FAULT. There are a lot of questions about this sort of thing when a band splits, and if Ryan wasn't *talking* to people from the label, how could he expect to know about the decisions that were being made.
It's weird, because for the first time in a long time, I'm not angry toward Ryan. I guess I can believe that there was some miscommunication (in that he refused to communicate with Decaydance and Pete), but I feel that it is really inappropriate and immature for him to say this now.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-15 01:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-15 01:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-15 01:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-15 01:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-15 01:30 am (UTC)Again, I'm just stuck on the two separate bands thing. I mean, Jon might not have realised about the contract since his was different from the rest of theirs, but still.
And yeah, we all know who fucking wrote the albums. There's never been a question. Why bring that up? I don't think Brendon and Spencer have ever tried to lay claim as writers. And while I do think it is a little strange that they're still performing the songs, when it comes down to it it is up to their bosses what happens. And since they *all* had creative control of the work, and since Ryan and Jon gave up their connection to it, I don't see what the issue is.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-15 01:45 am (UTC)Yeah, it could...I still think it was pretty douchey to say that they aren't friends anymore when he doesn't know how Spencer and Brendon feel about it. Spencer and Brendon might consider him a friend, and it's sad that Jon doesn't. Even Ryan has said that they're still friends, even though things are pretty weird right now.
Yup. I think it was pretty naive of them to think that they could all just quit panic! and that would be it. What about the contract, and the shows they had signed in to play with blink 182? After they split, they had to have sign a lot of paperwork and shit with the label, so IDG the supposed 'surprise' at finding out that spencer and brendon would keep the name. I'm not angry because they left and did their own thing, kudos to them since they seem happier now than ever, I just don't like how they're handling the situation.
And yeah, we all know who fucking wrote the albums. There's never been a question. Why bring that up?
I think he's using that as a reason why he thought brendon and spencer should've started a new band, because he says that ryan wrote the first album and he and ryan basically wrote the second album except for the songs Brendon wrote, so he maybe doesn't think they should sing the songs they didn't write? It's still douchey of him to say that because he wasn't there during the first album so he really shouldn't talk and make it seem like ryan has more right to keep the songs than they do...And the second album was a collaborative work! It belongs to panic as a whole, so IDG why he's making it seem like he and ryan have more right to the songs than they do.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-15 04:13 am (UTC)Then as I said under here, Andy explained that Panic songs aren't okay for TYV, so, again, since they didn't want them in the first place, I don't see the problem :/
I just hope things will calm down and rumors will stop once and for all! :(
no subject
Date: 2010-04-15 04:18 am (UTC)